Statement on internet shutdowns in Manipur in response to ongoing violence

Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) calls on the authorities in Manipur to review its decision to suspend mobile internet in the state and to comply with Supreme Court of India’s guidelines on internet shutdowns.

05 May, 2023
2 min read

May 5, 2023

Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) calls on the authorities in Manipur to review its decision to suspend internet in the state and to comply with Supreme Court of India’s guidelines on internet shutdowns.  

On May 3, the Commissioner (Home) of the Manipur state government, issued an order under Rule 2 of Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017 suspending mobile data services across the state for next five days. This was followed by an order dated May 4, 2023, extending the suspension to broadband services as well for a further period of five days. The orders were issued in response to ongoing violence in the state.

These orders were issued shortly after similar orders on April 27, 2023, which suspended internet services in two districts of Manipur for five days. As a result of the successive operation of all of these orders, residents of Manipur will be left without access to the internet for over ten nearly continuous days.

While these orders have claimed that “some anti-social elements” are using social media as “a handy tool” to “incite [the] general public”, and issued these orders for “stopping the spread of disinformation and false rumours” and to prevent “mobilization of mobs,” there is no evidence to suggest that internet shutdowns help in preventing misinformation or instances of violence. As argued by scholars and highlighted by IFF in the past, internet shutdowns are ineffective in quelling unrest and misinformation. Misinformation can still spread offline, but the main tool for fact-checking and receiving up-to-date information is often the Internet itself.

Internet shutdowns also have an immense negative impact on economic and professional activities including journalism, e-commerce and healthcare. In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India held that the freedom of speech over the internet and the freedom to carry out one’s trade or profession via the medium of the internet is a fundamental right, and must be accorded the protection of the Constitution.

IFF recognises the state government’s responsibility to maintain peace in the region, however, we’re deeply perturbed by the decision to completely shut down internet services for the reasons stated above. To safeguard the fundamental rights of citizens and promote transparency, IFF calls on the authorities to reconsider these internet suspension orders in compliance with the applicable laws.

Important Document

  • Internet Shutdown Order dated May 3, 2023 (link)
  • Internet Shutdown Order dated May 4, 2023 (link)

This blogpost has been edited to reflect that it cannot be definitively stated that misinformation spreads equally offline as it does online. A previous version of this statement said that "misinformation spreads equally easily offline".  

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

Delhi High Court directs government to submit affidavit confirming lack of written records in Aarogya Setu’s development

Updates on Saurav Das’ writ petition before the Delhi High Court, where he is contesting the Central Information Commission’s decision to withhold information related to Aarogya Setu.

4 min read

Supreme Court refers challenge to constitutionality of sedition law to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

Noting that the past cases under Section 124-A will not be affected on account of introduction of new Bills, a 3-judges bench of the Supreme Court led by the CJI has referred the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 124-A to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

5 min read

Shooting down bad ideas: Our response to TRAI’s consultation paper on OTT Regulation and Selective Banning

TRAI released a consultation paper on OTT regulation and selective banning. In our response, we expressed our view against the licensing and registration as well as selective banning of OTT communication services. See the post to read our detailed comments.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!