We express support to Safeguarding Democracy from Digital Platforms

IFF is in support of a statement released in collaboration with individuals and organisations demonstrating the need to uphold and defend the integrity of the next general elections.

06 April, 2019
1 min read

A non-partisan action plan on safeguarding elections and democracy from digital platforms and the misuse of social media has resulted out of a collective reflection by concerned civil society groups, including Common Cause, Internet Freedom Foundation, Free Software Movement of India, Association for Democratic Reform, and many former public servants, including Dr N. Gopalaswami and Dr S. Y. Quraishi, both former Chief Election Commissioners. We stand with these organisations and individuals demonstrating our support to the need for free and fair elections.

The statement is an urgent appeal to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to monitor the online spending of political parties for election campaigns, and not just spending by candidates. It makes six suggestions to uphold and defend the integrity of the next general elections. It asks the ECI to make it mandatory for political parties to disclose official Political Party/Individual handles on all major platforms such as Facebook, Twitter as well as lesser known platforms such as WeChat, Sharechat, TikTok, etc.

The statement has been endorsed by an array of leading citizens, academics, artists, former constitutional office holders, civil servants including Secretaries to the Government of India and retired CEC's and civil society members. As the parties are now preparing their manifestos, we urge them to consider the suggestions put forward.

Link to important documents:

  • Statement: Safeguarding Democracy from Digital Platforms (link)

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

Delhi High Court directs government to submit affidavit confirming lack of written records in Aarogya Setu’s development

Updates on Saurav Das’ writ petition before the Delhi High Court, where he is contesting the Central Information Commission’s decision to withhold information related to Aarogya Setu.

4 min read

Supreme Court refers challenge to constitutionality of sedition law to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

Noting that the past cases under Section 124-A will not be affected on account of introduction of new Bills, a 3-judges bench of the Supreme Court led by the CJI has referred the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 124-A to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

5 min read

Shooting down bad ideas: Our response to TRAI’s consultation paper on OTT Regulation and Selective Banning

TRAI released a consultation paper on OTT regulation and selective banning. In our response, we expressed our view against the licensing and registration as well as selective banning of OTT communication services. See the post to read our detailed comments.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!