The drafting process for the Data Protection Bill should not be shrouded in secrecy #SaveOurPrivacy

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has denied's request for transparency in the drafting of India's privacy law. We have filed first appeals under the RTI Act.

06 December, 2018
2 min read

This post is a part of our work to support a community oriented online campaign for a credible, user centric privacy law at

In a previous blog on 20th October, 2018, we stated how we had filed RTI’s with the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (“Meity”) for the consultation on the Draft Data Protection Bill. We had filed two RTIs in order to understand the real picture behind this. First, to get the details of all the comments sent to the Ministry. Second, apart from Ministry, who all are reviewing the comments and re-drafting the law.

  1. With regard to the details of the comments, the response was only limited to the number of submissions received (624) and no other information was provided. The request was disposed of by stating that the information was confidential and was to be examined by the Ministry.
  1. To the second RTI, Meity replied, “No information available with Cyber Law and Cyber Security Group of this Ministry”. We are completely unsatisfied by the responses of the Meity.

The answers received are insufficient, evasive and smack of secrecy. Right? Should such a secretive process be adopted to draft a significant law which will deeply impact a growing number of Indians who use technology in their lives.

We will not give up and yesterday we filed first appeals (link to appeal 1 and appeal 2) against these responses. We will continue pushing and take these to their logical conclusion.

About us

  • Work: The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) is an indian civil liberties organisation working on technology and fundamental rights. We work across a wide spectrum, with expertise in free speech, digital surveillance and privacy, net neutrality and innovation to champion of freedom in the digital space. To ensure that people in the world's largest democracy use the internet with liberty guaranteed under the Constitution of India.
  • Transparency: We are a non-profit registered under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. Aimed towards greater accountability to our donors who are ordinary internet users in India like you we have published detailed financial information that is updated regularly.

IFF Online:

(This post and the appeals have been drafted by the time and skills volunteered by Mohit Khetan)

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

Bombay HC reserves its judgment in petitions challenging the Union Government’s fact checking amendments, after final hearings conclude

The Bombay High Court has reserved its judgment in a batch of petitions filed by Association of Indian Magazines, Kunal Kamra and others, challenging the constitutionality of the IT Amendment Rules, 2023.

5 min read

The Supreme Court asks Government to file a counter in Foundation of Media Professional’s application for compliance with Anuradha Bhasin

The Supreme Court on September 21, 2023 has granted liberty to the Union Government to file its response.

2 min read

Shooting down (telcos’) bad ideas: We sent our counter comments to TRAI

We sent our counter comments to TRAI on its consultation paper which dealt with the idea of regulating, licensing, and selectively banning online communication services. We re-iterated our opposition to this idea and countered the arguments raised by telcos.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!