IFF Submission to TRAI on the Free Data Consultation

June 29, 2016 IFF has consistently advocated for an equal rated model in which there is no restriction or incentives to restrict user choice. This needs to be implemented urgently without violating net neutrality to bring a large number of Indians online who get a full chance at engaging with the diversity of the open internet. The submission which can be accessed here (link [http://trai.gov.in/Comments_FreeData/Companies_n_Organizations/Internet_Freedom_Foundation.pdf] ) was based on the foll

29 June, 2016
1 min read

June 29, 2016

IFF has consistently advocated for an equal rated model in which there is no restriction or incentives to restrict user choice. This needs to be implemented urgently without violating net neutrality to bring a large number of Indians online who get a full chance at engaging with the diversity of the open internet.

The submission which can be accessed here (link) was based on the following points:

● It voiced concern that that the certainty brought through clear rule making of the Differential Tariffs Prohibition Regulation may be undermined by the models proposed under the Free Data Consultation Paper.

● It cited available empirical data that makes a case against providing access through free data models which restrict user choice;

● In response to Query No. 4 appropriate regulatory action is needed to prevent circumvention of the discriminatory tariff regulation by TSPs building large CECN (Closed Electronic Communications Networks) which are otherwise offered to users for zero rated services.

IFF's submissions are with the intent of suggesting a clear regulatory path and removing any ambiguity on economic forms of discrimination.

After this, attention can be devoted to addressing technical forms of discrimination and addressing all remaining harms which emerge from violating Network Neutrality.

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

1
Delhi High Court directs government to submit affidavit confirming lack of written records in Aarogya Setu’s development

Updates on Saurav Das’ writ petition before the Delhi High Court, where he is contesting the Central Information Commission’s decision to withhold information related to Aarogya Setu.

4 min read

2
Supreme Court refers challenge to constitutionality of sedition law to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

Noting that the past cases under Section 124-A will not be affected on account of introduction of new Bills, a 3-judges bench of the Supreme Court led by the CJI has referred the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 124-A to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

5 min read

3
Shooting down bad ideas: Our response to TRAI’s consultation paper on OTT Regulation and Selective Banning

TRAI released a consultation paper on OTT regulation and selective banning. In our response, we expressed our view against the licensing and registration as well as selective banning of OTT communication services. See the post to read our detailed comments.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!