Reactions to the Aadhaar Judgement

Yesterday the Supreme Court pronounced a historic judgement on the constitutionality of the Aadhaar, biometric programme. We urge people to read this statement [https://rethinkaadhaar.in/blog/2018/9/26/press-statement-on-supreme-court-5-judge-bench-ruling-on-aadhaar-challenges] by our friends at Rethink Aadhaar [https://twitter.com/no2uid/] that contains a considered public response to it. Rethink Aadhaar's statement clearly sets out that there is a need for sustained engagement on the issue o

27 September, 2018
1 min read

Yesterday the Supreme Court pronounced a historic judgement on the constitutionality of the Aadhaar, biometric programme. We urge people to read this statement by our friends at Rethink Aadhaar that contains a considered public response to it. Rethink Aadhaar's statement clearly sets out that there is a need for sustained engagement on the issue of digital identity and its impact on welfare programs and personal liberty. As an organisation we hope to support others like Rethink Aadhaar on the frontlines and grow our work as per our statement on Nov. 27, 2017.

In addition to supporting others, IFF has been engaging on the issue of privacy and data protection by #SaveOurPrivacy (www.saveourprivacy.in) which is an important way to tackle the menace of Aadhaar. We strongly believe in the need for privacy protections and are concerned with surveillance and profiling. In the past we have done advocacy including  support for privacyisaright.in, an intervention in cases on Whatsapp-FB data sharing & Right to be Forgotten, sending a legal notice to the Govt. on the Social Media Communication Hub. We have also participated in several government consultations especially by the telecom regulator TRAI underscoring the need to protect your privacy rights. Much of our work is documented in statements available in the post archives and our social media handles.

Yes, we can do better in future, and we remain open to feedback and suggestions on how we can support a diverse set of citizen movements and activists; engage much more effectively through the lens of informational autonomy and personal liberty. So write to us at [email protected]

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

1
Delhi High Court directs government to submit affidavit confirming lack of written records in Aarogya Setu’s development

Updates on Saurav Das’ writ petition before the Delhi High Court, where he is contesting the Central Information Commission’s decision to withhold information related to Aarogya Setu.

4 min read

2
Supreme Court refers challenge to constitutionality of sedition law to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

Noting that the past cases under Section 124-A will not be affected on account of introduction of new Bills, a 3-judges bench of the Supreme Court led by the CJI has referred the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 124-A to a larger Bench of at least 5 judges

5 min read

3
Shooting down bad ideas: Our response to TRAI’s consultation paper on OTT Regulation and Selective Banning

TRAI released a consultation paper on OTT regulation and selective banning. In our response, we expressed our view against the licensing and registration as well as selective banning of OTT communication services. See the post to read our detailed comments.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!